further notes on last night's results

In addition to the analysis from Fair Vote Canada (which I hope you will read), I received this from a key Campaigner. Thank you!

+ + + +

PUTTING THIS FEDERAL ELECTION IN PERSPECTIVE:

2008 Voter Turnout:
59.1% of registered electors (or about 41% of all Canadians)
- one of the lowest in recent history

Total Conservative vote percentage:
2006 - 36.3%
2008 - 37.6%
- A 1.3% increase after governing moderately for 2 years
- From 127 to 143 seats (gained 16 seats)

Percentage of Canadians who did not vote for Harper's Conservatives: 62.4% (that's right, 62% of Canadians - who voted!)

Times Stephen Harper has attempted to get a majority and failed: Three times (in 2004, 2006, and 2008)

Harper's MAJOR advantages in September 2008:
- Dion as leader; perceived as weak, unable to communicate
- divided, indebted Liberal Party
- early triggering of election before U.S. election and possible recession (Harper broke his own fixed date election law)
- well financed corporate party with backing of Bay Street, Washington, defence, gas and oil industries, etc.
- Green Shift policy failure for Liberals during campaign

Harper's lost opportunities this time:
- best opportunity to win majority - but did not achieve it
- did not expand support in Quebec due to unpopular policy and Bloc
- no seats in Newfoundland thanks to successful "Anything But Conservative (ABC)" campaign

* * *

OVERALL SEAT COUNTS 2008:

Conservatives: 143
Opposition - Parties Supportive of War Resisters: 163

* * *

WAR RESISTER SUPPORTIVE PARTIES:

Liberal vote percentage:
2006 - 30.2%
2008 - 26.2%
From 95 to 76 seats

NDP vote percentage:
2006 - 17.5%
2008 - 18.2%
From 30 to 37 seats

Bloc Québécois
2006 - 10.5% (Canada-wide)
2008 - 10% (Canada-wide)
From 48 to 50 seats

Green vote percentage:
2006 - 4.5%
2008 - 6.8%
No seats

Note:
All of this is possible due to our multi-party first-past-the-post (FPTP) system which is not proportional and allows a numerical non-majority to rule as if they had majority support. Therefore, candidates and a party can win with less than 40% and can rule as if they have support of the majority of Canadians, even if they clearly do not.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

grapes and hops

What's the deal with wine here? I've figured out that the LCBO is owned and operated by the Province of Ontario. Certain US states have a similar deal; when I lived in Philadelphia, we bought wine or liquor at a "state store". Are liquor sales controlled by the province throughout Canada, or do different provinces have different liquor laws? I assume the latter. More importantly, are all LCBOs the same? There's one right around the corner from us, and while it's terrifically convenient, the selection is poor. Yesterday we checked out another LCBO - this one conveniently located next to a Beer Store - but the selection was nearly identical. So is this the wine that's available in Ontario? I know Canadians are beer-lovers, but stereotypes aside, what do people do when they want to drink a nice bottle of wine? We're also trying different Canadian beers, so if you have recommendations, send them in. Right now we're drinking Export (I prefer it to Can...
Read more

can of worms

I'm opening a sticky subject here, my need to understand causing me to throw caution to the wind. It's about Alberta. Alberta vs. the rest of the Canada. The Globe And Mail runs something about Alberta's gripes every day, and I try to follow along. If it weren't for wmtc's resident Albertan , and the ensuing arguments in comments, I would've had no warning. It's not something Americans know about. As is, observing for more than a year, I have only the smallest of clues. Here's what I know. Please pardon my ignorance and oversimplification, but I have to start somewhere. The province of Alberta is rich, because it has oil. The province of Alberta is conservative, relative to the rest of Canada. Hmm. Funny how those two go together. Because of its great oil wealth, Alberta revenue helps fund services in the rest of Canada. (These are transfer payments?) Apparently many Albertans resent this. They want to keep Alberta's money in Alberta. They don't...
Read more

sharia

This morning I see that Dalton McGuinty, Premier of Ontario, is banning the Muslim religious court known as sharia . This ends months of debate about whether sharia would be legal and binding in Ontario. I'm quoting at length from the story in today's Toronto Star because many US readers are likely not up on this. In a surprise announcement that caught both supporters and opponents of sharia law off guard, Premier Dalton McGuinty says he will move quickly to ban all religious arbitration in the province. McGuinty made the announcement in a telephone interview with The Canadian Press yesterday after months of debate and controversy surrounding use of Islamic sharia law in family arbitration. "I've come to the conclusion that the debate has gone on long enough," the premier told the news agency. "There will be no sharia law in Ontario. There will be no religious arbitration in Ontario. There will be one law for all Ontarians." The announcement prompted t...
Read more