swept

How many days til spring training?

Now, about those Maple Leafs...

Comments

  1. teflonjedi8 October 2005 at 05:55

    Is Hockey Night in Canada going back on the air? I can't tell from out here...

    ReplyDelete
  2. teflonjedi8 October 2005 at 05:58

    And yes, Red Sox Nation is very much in mourning this morning. Is it coincidence that the remnants of a tropical storm are pouring down on us right now?

    ReplyDelete
  3. Anonymous8 October 2005 at 07:29

    They stepped up and played a good game, though, and kept it close until the top of the ninth. Some good Chicago D saved the day for the White Sox. If they were going to go out, at least they made it a close one, and kept it interesting all game long. Even I (who loves to criticise all) can't be too critical of that. There's always next season ... look at the Angels, as a prime example of a team back in title contention after an off year.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Unknown8 October 2005 at 11:32

    For someone (me) who doesn't know this yet.

    Why are they called the Toronto Maple Leafs when we have maple leaves on the ground?

    That's what I thought up while running this morning... Oh the thoughts you have while you think to yourself...

    ReplyDelete
  5. laura k9 October 2005 at 05:16

    There's always next season ...

    The motto of baseball fans everywhere: wait til next year.

    look at the Angels, as a prime example of a team back in title contention after an off year.

    After winning the WS in 1996, the Yankees lost the division series to Cleveland in 1997, then came back as a dynasty. I'm hoping the Red Sox can manage it, too.

    Thanks for the good wishes, G. :)

    ReplyDelete
  6. laura k9 October 2005 at 05:17

    Why are they called the Toronto Maple Leafs when we have maple leaves on the ground?

    Anybody...?

    ReplyDelete
  7. James Redekop11 October 2005 at 18:13

    English has some odd rules concerning pluralization of words ending with "f". Leaf -> leaves, roof -> rooves, but elf -> elfs and proof -> proofs. Not to mention dwarf -> dwarrows. Unless you're J.R.R. Tolkien, in which case it's elf -> elves and dwarf -> dwarves.

    Apparently the rule here is that compound nouns ("Maple Leaf", "lowlife", "sabretooth", "still life") are pluralized with -s instead of whatever the last part would normally use. You don't say "lowlives", "sabreteeth", or "still lives". Thus, "Maple Leafs".

    Then again, there's "Red Sock" -> "Red Sox"...

    ReplyDelete
  8. laura k12 October 2005 at 05:35

    Then again, there's "Red Sock" -> "Red Sox"..

    If you read anything written in English before the 18th Century, spelling hadn't yet been standardized, and you get some funny combinations. You might be, for example, a musique fanatique.

    I'm pretty sure the Rolling Stones were around then, right? Led by Micque Jaggre?

    ReplyDelete
  9. James Redekop12 October 2005 at 10:05

    Given that the aristocracy was essentially French (Norman), it's not surprising that people would adopt Frenchish spelling to try to look more "sophisticated". :)

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

grapes and hops

What's the deal with wine here? I've figured out that the LCBO is owned and operated by the Province of Ontario. Certain US states have a similar deal; when I lived in Philadelphia, we bought wine or liquor at a "state store". Are liquor sales controlled by the province throughout Canada, or do different provinces have different liquor laws? I assume the latter. More importantly, are all LCBOs the same? There's one right around the corner from us, and while it's terrifically convenient, the selection is poor. Yesterday we checked out another LCBO - this one conveniently located next to a Beer Store - but the selection was nearly identical. So is this the wine that's available in Ontario? I know Canadians are beer-lovers, but stereotypes aside, what do people do when they want to drink a nice bottle of wine? We're also trying different Canadian beers, so if you have recommendations, send them in. Right now we're drinking Export (I prefer it to Can...
Read more

can of worms

I'm opening a sticky subject here, my need to understand causing me to throw caution to the wind. It's about Alberta. Alberta vs. the rest of the Canada. The Globe And Mail runs something about Alberta's gripes every day, and I try to follow along. If it weren't for wmtc's resident Albertan , and the ensuing arguments in comments, I would've had no warning. It's not something Americans know about. As is, observing for more than a year, I have only the smallest of clues. Here's what I know. Please pardon my ignorance and oversimplification, but I have to start somewhere. The province of Alberta is rich, because it has oil. The province of Alberta is conservative, relative to the rest of Canada. Hmm. Funny how those two go together. Because of its great oil wealth, Alberta revenue helps fund services in the rest of Canada. (These are transfer payments?) Apparently many Albertans resent this. They want to keep Alberta's money in Alberta. They don't...
Read more

sharia

This morning I see that Dalton McGuinty, Premier of Ontario, is banning the Muslim religious court known as sharia . This ends months of debate about whether sharia would be legal and binding in Ontario. I'm quoting at length from the story in today's Toronto Star because many US readers are likely not up on this. In a surprise announcement that caught both supporters and opponents of sharia law off guard, Premier Dalton McGuinty says he will move quickly to ban all religious arbitration in the province. McGuinty made the announcement in a telephone interview with The Canadian Press yesterday after months of debate and controversy surrounding use of Islamic sharia law in family arbitration. "I've come to the conclusion that the debate has gone on long enough," the premier told the news agency. "There will be no sharia law in Ontario. There will be no religious arbitration in Ontario. There will be one law for all Ontarians." The announcement prompted t...
Read more